How is WPA2-PSK and WPA2 EAP PSK?
What are the differences between WPA2-PSK and WPA2 EAP-PSK? What are the pros and cons of using one configuration or the other?
WPA2 EAP-PSK uses WPA2-Enterprise to do an 802.1X authentication to server. It uses the PSK method of EAP and allows a client to authenticate with just the use of a PSK.
The pros of WPA2-PSK is that it is supported in every 802.11 device of relatively recent manufacture (2nd gen 802.11g or so). It is simple to set up and simple to use. WPA2 EAP PSK should be somewhat more secure in that it would be harder to calculate the PSK from captured traffic. However, many of the same vulnerabilities exist if an attacker were able to get a hold of the PSK (social engineering, written down, etc).
There are a number of drawbacks: Like other WPA2-Enterprise methods, you need to have an authentication server set up to authenticate against which adds complexity. Both the server and the client supplicant need to support the EAP method. AFAIK, only wpa_supplicant has support for EAP-PSK and you will not find this native on most devices. EAP-PSK has never passed the "experimental" stage of development. There doesn't seem to be a lot of interest in it, either people don't want the complexity of WPA2-Enterprise at all (even with a simple authentication method) or they are content to use other more widely supported EAP methods.