What are the benefits of using WITH TABLOCK on an INSERT?
Under some circumstances, doing an INSERT INTO
Is there any other potential performance benefit to using WITH TABLOCK on an INSERT on an empty table when the database (tempdb) is using the SIMPLE recovery model?
I'm working with SQL Server 2012 Standard Edition.
My use case is for creating and then immediately
populating a temp table within a stored procedure using an INSERT...SELECT, which could contain as many as a few million rows. I try to avoid that kind of tempdb abuse, but it is sometimes needed.
I'm trying to build a case to require TABLOCK. It doesn't seem like it would hurt anything, and might have a benefit. I'm trying to figure out if there is enough potential benefit to add it wherever throughout our code base, where I'm sure there is no other process that wants to write to the table.
I'm usually inserting into a newly created local temp table with a clustered PK, but do sometimes use a heap.
Under some circumstances, doing an INSERT INTO (WITH TABLOCK) will be faster due to minimal logging. Those circumstances include having the database in the BULK_LOGGED recovery model.
Is there any other potential performance benefit to using WITH TABLOCK on an INSERT on an empty table when the database (tempdb) is using the SIMPLE recovery model?
I'm working with SQL Server 2012 Standard Edition.
My use case is for creating and then immediately populating a temp table within a stored procedure using an INSERT...SELECT, which could contain as many as a few million rows. I try to avoid that kind of tempdb abuse, but it is sometimes needed.
I'm trying to build a case to require TABLOCK. It doesn't seem like it would hurt anything, and might have a benefit. I'm trying to figure out if there is enough potential benefit to add it wherever throughout our code base, where I'm sure there is no other process that wants to write to the table.
I'm usually inserting into a newly created local temp table with a clustered PK, but do sometimes use a heap.
Answer (1)
Using the WITH (TABLOCK) hint on an INSERT statement in SQL Server can provide several benefits, particularly in scenarios involving bulk inserts or performance tuning. Here are the key benefits:
Improved Performance for Bulk Inserts:
When performing bulk inserts, using WITH (TABLOCK) can improve performance by allowing the database engine to use more efficient locking strategies.
Instead of acquiring row-level or page-level locks, which can be numerous and resource-intensive, a table-level lock (TABLOCK) is acquired, reducing the overhead of lock management.
Minimal Logging (Bulk-Logged Mode):
In databases set to the bulk-logged or simple recovery model, using WITH (TABLOCK) can enable minimal logging for bulk operations, reducing the amount of log space used and speeding up the insert process.
This is particularly useful for large data loads, as it reduces the impact on the transaction log and can help avoid log file growth.
For large inserts, acquiring a table-level lock reduces lock contention with other transactions that might be trying to acquire row or page locks.
This can lead to fewer deadlocks and less waiting time for locks, improving overall transaction throughput.
Enhanced Parallelism:
SQL Server can optimize the insert operation for parallel execution when using WITH (TABLOCK), which can further improve performance by leveraging multiple CPUs for the operation.
This can be particularly beneficial on systems with high concurrency and multiple processors.
Example Usage
Here is an example of using WITH (TABLOCK) in an INSERT statement:INSERT INTO TargetTable WITH (TABLOCK)SELECT * FROM SourceTable;ConsiderationsWhile WITH (TABLOCK) provides these benefits, there are also some considerations to keep in mind:
Acquiring a table-level lock means that other operations that need to access the table will be blocked until the insert operation is complete.
This can lead to reduced concurrency and potential blocking issues in highly transactional environments.
Appropriate Use Cases:
WITH (TABLOCK) is most beneficial in scenarios involving large, bulk insert operations or data loads where the primary goal is to maximize insert performance.
For small or single-row inserts, the overhead of acquiring a table-level lock might outweigh the benefits.
Recovery Model:
The benefits related to minimal logging apply primarily when the database is in the bulk-logged or simple recovery model. In the full recovery model, minimal logging is not possible, and the impact on the transaction log will be similar to normal logging.
By understanding these benefits and considerations, you can make informed decisions about when to use WITH (TABLOCK) to optimize insert operations in your SQL Server databases.